Climate change and town planning | Brussels Blog

Climate change and town planning

posted by on 13th Sep 2019

The second of two blogs commenting on recent reports from the Committee on Climate Change.

This encourages the Committee to consider an extended version of town planning.

Climate change and town planning

Professor Sir Ian Boyd has just retired from his position as chief scientist at Defra. In Climate change: Big lifestyle changes ‘needed to cut emissions’, the BBC’s Roger Harrabin reported him as saying:

People must use less transport, eat less red meat and buy fewer clothes if the UK is to virtually halt greenhouse gas emissions by 2050

Sir Ian warned that persuasive political leadership was needed to carry the public through the challenge. One aspect of such leadership would be to inform the public about the severity climate change and the big lifestyle changes ‘needed to cut emissions’. [Note: Public campaigns]

continue reading…

Carbon footprints & wildfires

posted by on 23rd Aug 2019

The first of two blogs commenting on recent reports from the Committee on Climate Change.

This first questions the official version of climate science that the Committee follows.

The official science of climate change

continue reading…

Smith’s photo

posted by on 17th Aug 2019
Reduced version of Smith’s photo

This morning, Smith was sitting next to me in the coffee bar.

I was feeling a bit miserable about the state of the world.

Smith’s lovely photo made it a little better.

Smith. Thank you for letting me share it on my blog.

Find the full version on dropbox.

One small step for York, one giant leap for the World

posted by on 23rd Jul 2019

(On the 50th anniversary of man’s first moon landing.)

Submission to the Public Inquiry on the 2018 York Local Plan

Joking aside, I believe this submission on the York Local Plan can start something of worldwide importance. Worrying climate feedbacks are mentioned in the accompanying document The York Local Plan: Climate Change. These climate feedbacks are eating into the remaining carbon budgets. Keeping to these budgets is one of the few ways to stop climate change becoming completely out of control. These are described in a video on “cascading tipping points” in the video by Paul Beckwith [1].

continue reading…

Oxford Economics 2: Chasing productivity

posted by on 14th Jul 2019
More productivity needed?

In How robots change the world, Oxford Economics ignored climate change. Their report contains some interesting conclusions about how robots will destroy jobs by replacing workers while creating other jobs by generating economic growth.

continue reading…

Models of reducing carbon emissions – and negative emissions?

posted by on 11th Jul 2019

Models of reducing carbon emissions

My previous post discussed a recent report from Oxford Economics,which discussed the replacement of workers by robots. It predicted that on average 1.6 workers will lose their jobs for every industrial robot installed.
However, the introduction of robots will generate economic growth and create jobs:

Our study shows that the current wave of robotization tends to boost productivity and economic growth, generating new employment opportunities at a rate comparable to the pace of job destruction.

My post criticised Oxford Economics because their report ignored climate change: To keep to climate targets steep falls in carbon emissions are necessary. This is very unlikely to be possible with continued economic growth.


Recently a graph in a tweet by Greta Thunberg caught my attention

Figure 1

continue reading…

Oxford Economics 1: Robots and climate

posted by on 26th Jun 2019

I heard the news today on BBC, ITV [1] and followed up online [2].

One interesting story concerned a report by Oxford Economics [3] about how every new industrial robot would destroy 2.2 jobs in poor areas and 1.3 jobs in wealthier areas. Apparently, this will be countered by the increased economic growth that these robots will bring.

However reports in the media did not mention the effects of economic growth on climate change so perhaps Oxford Economics should do some more research.

A start would be to look at the global yearly emissions of CO2 and also at the Keeling Curve showing increased CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere:

continue reading…

Topics for enhanced town planning: #6 to #10

posted by on 24th Jun 2019

We must find new ways of living: New pleasant ways of living that do not destroy our planet..

#6 Car-free cities are cheaper

n 1992, Carlo Ripa di Meana was the European Commission Environment Commissioner. He called for cities to be free of cars he said he was ready to become car-less, and so should other city dwellers, to prevent Europe’s cities being choked by the internal combustion engine.

He publicised a study he had commissioned showing that it would cost between 2 and 5 times less to live and work in car-free cities because of the savings people could make in not having cars to buy, park, insure and maintain.

A press release from the European Commission in 1992 said:

Based on these observations, Carlo RIPA di MEANA, the European Environment Commissioner, has had a study carried out on car-free cities in an attempt to find the answer to the following question: Is it possible, and if so to what extent, to conceive of a city which will operate more efficiently than the type of cities we have at present, using alternative means of transport to the private car?

The answer provided by the study is positive, even in purely financial terms: the car-free city costs between two and five times less (the costs varying depending on the population density of the city).

That study may have hastened his exit from the European Commission

continue reading…

Housing – work in progress

posted by on 14th Jun 2019


This is a summary of a series of posts on housing from my site . When I have the energy and time I will rework these posts.

Personal remaining carbon budget: 64 tonnes CO2e

There is an important consideration that should be a precursor to this series: A representative remaining carbon budget. My judgement is that if humans emit more than 64 tonnes of greenhouse gasses each – measured as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), horrid things will happen.

This is a moral judgement informed by science as explained here. and estimated in #1 of Topics for Enhanced Town Planning.

This post is as an index to previous work and may be of more interest to me than others. The heading of each “Part” is a link to the original article.

Part 1: embodied carbon and climate

continue reading…

A moral judgement informed by science.

posted by on 14th Jun 2019

A representative personal remaining carbon budget

How much greenhouse gas can you reasonably emit? This is a personal judgement. Your judgement will depend on:

  1.  Your judgment of the consequences of climate change
  2. Whether you believe climate models are accurate
  3.  How you think Earth saving technology will develop
  4.  How much you care about the future
  5.  Whether you think mitigation is a lost cause.

Notes …

continue reading…